Standardized tests have become an integral component of the American education system, but their role in academics remains widely debated. They shape curriculum, influence education policies, and even affect students’ college admissions. Since these assessments are so impactful, it’s important to recognize both the pros and cons of standardized testing.
While these tests might not be the most fun for students, they can be a useful tool for evaluating performance and comparing student achievement across diverse backgrounds and socioeconomic statuses. This helps us identify gaps in educational equity and find areas for improvement.
On the other hand, some educators argue that standardized tests measure learning inaccurately, reinforce bias, and place heavy pressure on students and teachers alike. However, there are ways to acknowledge the cons of standardized testing, while still reaping the benefits of the pros.
All in all, understanding the pros and cons of standardized testing requires thoughtful consideration and an open mind. By exploring both sides, we can work toward a more balanced, student-centered approach that honors data while valuing the diverse ways children learn and grow.
Standardized tests are a type of assessment designed to measure student knowledge and performance in a consistent way. In these exams, all students answer the same set of questions and are graded using a uniform scoring system.
This kind of testing is used throughout education, from third grade to high school. Standardized tests determine if students are meeting grade-level standards in core subjects like math and literacy. Once scores are documented, the results are often used to track academic progress and ensure students are progressing at the expected rate.
Standardized testing, when thoughtfully implemented, can be helpful for supporting student success. Some of the pros of standardized testing include providing insights into student growth, guiding instruction, and encouraging all learners to work toward shared academic goals.
One of the pros of standardized testing is the ability to track student progress over time. Annual assessments provide relevant data to compare year-by-year growth, helping set meaningful benchmarks for academic achievement.
These results also allow schools to spot subject-specific trends. By tracking student performance in core areas such as math, reading, and writing, educators can reflect on what’s working—and what’s not.
Another pro of standardized testing is its ability to highlight where students are excelling and where they may need additional support.
By identifying patterns in student performance, these assessments give teachers the information they need to tailor instruction, differentiate lessons, and provide targeted interventions that address specific learning gaps. This data-driven approach helps ensure that no student is left behind.
For students themselves, standardized tests offer valuable insight into their own strengths and weaknesses, motivating them to focus their efforts on specific areas.
Standardized tests also serve a broader purpose beyond the individual classroom. One of the pros of standardized testing is that it allows school administrators to assess whether educational goals are being met at the school, district, and state levels.
Because standardized tests are objective, they eliminate much of the ambiguity from more subjective forms of assessment. This consistency helps educators and schools across the country stay aligned. If some areas of instruction are found to be weakest, steps can be taken to implement professional development and improve teaching methods.
However, standardized test results should only be one piece of information used for evaluating teacher practices. Keep in mind, these scores don’t capture the full scope of what great instruction looks like.
Ready to bring movement-based learning to your core subjects? Discover our Math and Literacy Kits, designed to ignite engagement and boost student achievement.
Our kits supplement your curriculum and provide comprehensive resources for:
While standardized testing offers several benefits, it also comes with notable challenges. Many educators, parents, and researchers have raised concerns about the cons of standardized testing, especially regarding the limited scope, potential bias, influence on classroom instruction, and students’ stress levels.
These drawbacks have sparked an ongoing and important conversation about the pros and cons of standardized testing and whether it is truly the best way to measure academic progress.
A con of standardized testing is that these tests only provide a narrow view of student learning. A single test score can’t truly capture the full range of a child’s abilities, knowledge, or potential.
Students are complex learners, and standardized tests often leave out important subject areas such as science, history, art, music, and physical education.
Consequently, students who excel in those areas may feel overlooked and unrecognized. EdWeek reported that in a 2018 survey, “K-3 teachers said they spent a daily average of 89 minutes on English/language arts and 57 minutes on math, but only 18 minutes on science and 16 on social studies.” This imbalance can narrow students’ learning experiences and diminish the richness of a well-rounded education.
Finally, while uniform rubrics are often cited among the pros of standardized testing, this consistency can come at a cost. Standardized assessments often fail to account for students with unique learning needs, such as those with ADHD or other learning differences.
In these cases, the structure of the test itself may prevent students from demonstrating what they truly know and can do.
One crucial con of standardized testing is the potential for inequity and bias. While these assessments aim to provide objective measures of academic performance, they often reflect disparities in access to resources, cultural background, or language proficiency.
For example, students from under-resourced schools may not have the same test preparation opportunities as peers in wealthier school districts, and English language learners may face additional barriers in demonstrating their true understanding of concepts.
These gaps can make standardized test results less about a child’s actual ability and more about the circumstances they face.
Another major concern—and one of the cons of standardized testing—is the pressure it places on teachers to focus primarily on test preparation. When class time is centered around ranking, performance metrics, and meeting testing benchmarks, it takes away from more meaningful, individualized learning experiences.
This focus is known as “teaching to the test”. Research shows that this approach can limit how material is taught, leaving little room for creativity and deeper critical thinking. For many students, this model can be discouraging.
For example, a child with a natural aptitude for physical activity might struggle to stay engaged during long periods of desk-based test prep. However, integrating kinesthetic tools, like math mats and manipulatives, can tap into these strengths, making learning more interactive and memorable.
Another widely recognized con of standardized testing is the stress and anxiety it can cause. Specifically, many students experience test anxiety, a condition that can impede their performance on standardized assessments. This means a student’s score might not reflect their actual understanding or ability, which undermines the very purpose of the test.
For some students, especially younger children, this pressure can be overwhelming. Standardized testing can lead to frustration, discouragement, and a lasting negative relationship with test-taking. If the focus shifts too heavily toward improvement and performance, it can unintentionally harm a child’s confidence and love of learning.
Furthermore, parents with high expectations may put undue stress and pressure on their child to improve after receiving a poor standardized test score. Oftentimes, this can do more harm than good. Schools should communicate what the tests are measuring, what the results mean, and if any academic intervention is needed.
Considering this negative emotional effect is as equally important as considering the academic effects.
The pros and cons of standardized testing should be carefully evaluated. These assessments can provide valuable insights into student learning, but they should never be the sole measure of a student’s potential.
While the pros of standardized testing include consistency and the ability to identify academic gaps, relying too heavily on scores can overlook individual strengths, creativity, and growth.
The use of standardized testing is likely to continue, and there is value in it, but it should be balanced by:
Supplemental assessments, such as kinesthetic methods from Math & Movement, can provide a more complete picture of student progress. By thoughtfully considering the pros and cons of standardized testing, we can create learning environments that are both data-informed and deeply student-centered.
At Math & Movement, we believe in the power of movement-based learning to make education more inclusive, joyful, and effective. By incorporating movement into daily lessons, teachers can create dynamic learning environments that not only prepare students for standardized tests but also reduce anxiety and improve long-term retention.
While normal test preparation might focus on worksheets, kinesthetic learning with Math & Movement allows students to physically step through math problems and vocabulary words, while reinforcing concepts in a fun, engaging way.
You can get started with movement-based math practice right away by downloading our FREE Training Manual. The PDF includes over 250 exercises, perfect for transition times, between lessons, or whenever your class needs a minute to reset. They do not require any materials – only your students’ bodies, energy, and imaginations.
Movement isn't just for recess
Want to get started with movement-based learning right now? Enter your email to get our training manual with over 250 active math movements. No materials necessary!
See how simple adding movement can be!
Let’s work together to support students in every way we can—academically, emotionally, and physically. Explore Math & Movement’s tools that bring active learning to the next level in your classrooms.
Suzy Koontz, CEO and Founder of Math & Movement, has spent over 25 years helping students achieve academic success. She has created over 200 kinesthetic teaching tools adopted by schools nationwide and has authored over 20 books. As a sought-after national presenter, Suzy shares how movement can transform the way students learn.
Movement isn't just for recess
Want to get started with movement-based learning right now? Enter your email to get our training manual with over 250 active math movements. No materials necessary!
Please leave your email and a quick note for us. We will get back to you soon! In the meantime, here are answers to some of our most common questions:
Enter your email to get our training manual with over 250 active math movements. No materials necessary!
We never share or sell your data.
